Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 72nd Session

A/RES/75/135View PDF

Who adopted this document and its mandates?

A Resolution of the General Assembly, under agenda item 80 Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its 72nd session, published in 2020.

What other versions does this mandate have?

13 versions · 1990–2022

This is an older version — the most recent is A/RES/77/103

Year	Symbol	Title	Word length	Text similarity
2022	A/RES/77/103	Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its 73rd session	2,913	78%Compare
2021	A/RES/76/111	Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its 72nd session	2,631	76%Compare
2020	A/RES/75/135	Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its 72nd session	2,686	86%Compare
2020	A/RES/74/186	Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its 71st session	2,617	58%Compare
2012	A/RES/66/98	Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its 63rd session	2,207	66%Compare

Which reports were submitted under this mandate?

1 report · 2010

Year	Symbol	Title		Mandate resolution
2010	A/65/186	Assistance to special rapporteurs of the International Law Commission report of the Secretary-General		A/RES/64/114

What subjects does this mandate have?

4 subjects

Documentation International Law International Law Codification Publications

What’s in this document?

45 operative paragraphs

Affirms its decisions 74/545, 74/559 and 74/566;

Takes note once again of the report of the International Law Commission on the work of its seventy-first session;³

³See Official Records of the General Assembly, Seventy-fourth Session, Supplement No. 10 (A/74/10).

Reiterates its appreciation to the International Law Commission for the work accomplished at its seventy-first session;⁴

⁴Ibid.

Recommends that the International Law Commission continue its work on the topics in its current programme of work, taking into account the comments and observations of Governments, whether submitted in writing or expressed orally in debates in the Sixth Committee;

Draws the attention of Governments to the importance for the International Law Commission of having their views, which remain welcome until 31 December 2020, on the various aspects of the topics on the agenda of the Commission, in particular on all the specific issues identified in chapter III of its report,⁵ regarding:

⁵Ibid.

Immunity of State officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction;

Succession of States in respect of State responsibility;

General principles of law;

Sea-level rise in relation to international law;

Also draws the attention of Governments to the importance for the International Law Commission of having their comments and observations on the draft conclusions on peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens) and the draft principles on protection of the environment in relation to armed conflicts adopted on first reading by the Commission at its seventy-first session,⁶ and takes note of the extension of the deadline to 30 June 2021 for Governments, international organizations and others, as applicable, to submit comments and observations to the Secretary-General;

⁶Ibid., paras. 56 and 70.

Takes note of the decision of the International Law Commission to include the topic “Sea-level rise in relation to international law” in its programme of work,⁷ and encourages the Commission to continue the examination of the topics that are in its long-term programme of work;⁸

⁷Ibid., para. 285.

⁸The following topics are currently in the long-term programme of work of the International Law Commission: “Ownership and protection of wrecks beyond the limits of national maritime jurisdiction”, “Jurisdictional immunity of international organizations”, “Protection of personal data in transborder flow of information”, “Extraterritorial jurisdiction”, “The fair and equitable treatment standard in international investment law”, “Settlement of international disputes to which international organizations are parties”, “Evidence before international courts and tribunals”, “Universal criminal jurisdiction”, “Reparation to individuals for gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law” and “Prevention and repression of piracy and armed robbery at sea”.

Encourages the International Law Commission to take particular account of the capacity and views of Member States, as well as of the workload of the Commission, when including topics in its current programme of work;

Takes note of paragraphs 289 to 291 of the report of the International Law Commission⁹ and notes, in particular, the inclusion of the topics “Reparation to individuals for gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law” and “Prevention and repression of piracy and armed robbery at sea” in the long-term programme of work of the Commission,¹⁰ and in this regard calls upon the Commission to take into consideration the comments, concerns and observations expressed by Governments during the debate in the Sixth Committee;

⁹Official Records of the General Assembly, Seventy-fourth Session, Supplement No. 10 (A/74/10).

¹⁰Ibid., para. 290.

Also takes note of paragraph 302 of the report of the International Law Commission,¹¹ and requests the Secretary-General to continue his efforts to identify concrete options for support for the work of special rapporteurs, additional to those provided under General Assembly resolution 56/272 of 27 March 2002;

¹¹Official Records of the General Assembly, Seventy-fourth Session, Supplement No. 10 (A/74/10).

Reiterates its appreciation of the efforts of the International Law Commission to improve its methods of work,¹² and encourages the Commission to continue this practice;

¹²Ibid., Sixty-sixth Session, Supplement No. 10 (A/66/10), paras. 370–388.

Invites the International Law Commission to continue to take measures to enhance its efficiency and productivity and to consider making proposals to Member States to that end;

Recalls the importance of an in-depth analysis of State practice and the consideration of the diversity of legal systems of Member States to the work of the International Law Commission;

Takes note of paragraph 306 of the report of the International Law Commission,¹³ recalls the paramount importance of multilingualism as set forth in General Assembly resolutions 69/324 of 11 September 2015 and 71/328 of 11 September 2017 on multilingualism, underlines the importance of having the documents of the Commission published in due time in the six official languages of the United Nations while ensuring their accuracy in all official languages, and to this end requests special rapporteurs to submit their reports within the time limits specified by the Secretariat, and the Secretariat to give due consideration to the quality of the translation of the documents of the Commission in the six official languages;

¹³Ibid., Seventy-fourth Session, Supplement No. 10 (A/74/10).

Encourages the International Law Commission to continue to take cost-saving measures at its future sessions, without prejudice to the efficiency and effectiveness of its work;

Recalls that the seat of the International Law Commission is at the United Nations Office at Geneva;

Takes note of the letter dated 10 September 2020 from the Chair of the International Law Commission at its seventy-first session and the Chair-designate for the seventy-second session of the Commission, and decides that the next session of the Commission shall be held at the United Nations Office at Geneva from 26 April to 4 June and from 5 July to 6 August 2021;

Stresses the desirability of further enhancing the dialogue between the International Law Commission, in particular the special rapporteurs, and the Sixth Committee, and in this context encourages, inter alia, the continued practice of informal consultations in the form of discussions between the members of the Sixth Committee and the members of the Commission throughout the year;

Encourages delegations, during the debate on the report of the International Law Commission, to continue to adhere as far as possible to the structured work programme agreed to by the Sixth Committee and to consider presenting concise and focused statements;

Encourages Member States to consider being represented at the level of legal adviser during the first week in which the report of the International Law Commission is discussed in the Sixth Committee (International Law Week) to enable high-level discussions on issues of international law;

Underlines in this regard the necessity to allow sufficient time for the consideration of the report of the International Law Commission in the Sixth Committee;

Requests the International Law Commission to continue to pay special attention to indicating in its annual report, for each topic, any specific issues on which expressions of views by Governments, either in the Sixth Committee or in written form, would be of particular interest in providing effective guidance for the Commission in its further work;

Takes note of paragraphs 314 to 319 of the report of the International Law Commission¹⁴ with regard to cooperation and interaction with other bodies, and encourages the Commission to continue the implementation of articles 16 (e), 25 and 26 of its statute in order to further strengthen cooperation between the Commission and other bodies concerned with international law, having in mind the usefulness of such cooperation;

¹⁴Ibid.

Notes that consulting with national organizations and individual experts concerned with international law may assist Governments in considering whether to make comments and observations on drafts submitted by the International Law Commission and in formulating their comments and observations;

Reaffirms its previous decisions concerning the indispensable role of the Codification Division of the Office of Legal Affairs of the Secretariat in providing assistance to the International Law Commission, including in the preparation of memorandums and studies on topics on the agenda of the Commission;

Also reaffirms its previous decisions concerning the documentation and summary records of the International Law Commission;¹⁵

¹⁵See resolutions 32/151, para. 10, and 37/111, para. 5, and all subsequent resolutions on the annual reports of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly; see also Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1982, vol. II (Part Two), paras. 267–269 and 271, as well as all subsequent annual reports of the International Law Commission.

Stresses the need to expedite the preparation of the summary records of the International Law Commission, and welcomes the continuation of the measures taken to streamline the processing of summary records during the sixty-fifth session of the Commission,¹⁶ which have led to a more rational use of resources, and expresses its satisfaction that the summary records of the Commission, constituting travaux préparatoires in the progressive development and codification of international law, will not be subject to arbitrary length restrictions;

¹⁶Official Records of the General Assembly, Sixty-eighth Session, Supplement No. 10 (A/68/10), para. 183.

Welcomes the institutionalization of the practice of the Secretariat to include on the website of the International Law Commission the provisional summary records in English and French relating to the work of the Commission;

Also welcomes the efforts of the Secretariat in seeking to ensure the timely and efficient processing of the documents of the International Law Commission and the institutionalization of the experimental measures taken during the sixty-eighth session of the Commission to streamline the editing of those documents;

Takes note of paragraph 303 of the report of the International Law Commission,¹⁷ and underlines the importance of the publications of the Codification Division to the work of the Commission, welcomes in particular the issuance of the ninth edition of The Work of the International Law Commission also in Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish, and reiterates its request that the Secretary-General continue to publish The Work of the International Law Commission in all six official languages at the beginning of each quinquennium, the Reports of International Arbitral Awards in English or French and the Summaries of the Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders of the International Court of Justice in all six official languages every five years;

¹⁷Ibid., Seventy-fourth Session, Supplement No. 10 (A/74/10).

Also takes note of paragraph 308 of the report of the International Law Commission,¹⁸ stresses the unique value of the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, and requests the Secretary-General to ensure its timely publication in all official languages;

¹⁸Ibid.

Expresses its appreciation to Governments that have made voluntary contributions to the trust fund on the backlog relating to the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, and encourages further contributions to the trust fund;

Takes note of paragraph 309 of the report of the International Law Commission,¹⁹ expresses its satisfaction with the remarkable progress achieved in the past few years in reducing the backlog of the Yearbook of the International Law Commission in all six languages, welcomes the efforts made by the Division of Conference Management of the United Nations Office at Geneva, especially its Editing Section, in effectively implementing relevant resolutions of the General Assembly calling for the reduction of the backlog, encourages that Division to provide continuous necessary support to the Editing Section in advancing the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, and requests that updates on progress made in this respect be provided to the Commission on a regular basis;

¹⁹Ibid.

Welcomes the continuous efforts of the Codification Division to maintain and improve the website relating to the work of the International Law Commission;

Expresses the hope that the International Law Seminar will continue to be held in connection with the sessions of the International Law Commission and that an increasing number of participants representing the principal legal systems of the world, including in particular those from developing countries, will be given the opportunity to attend the Seminar, as well as delegates to the Sixth Committee, and appeals to States to continue to make urgently needed voluntary contributions to the United Nations trust fund for the International Law Seminar;

Requests the Secretary-General to provide the International Law Seminar with adequate services, including interpretation, as required, and encourages him to continue to consider ways to improve the structure and content of the Seminar;

Underlines the importance of the records and topical summary of the debate in the Sixth Committee for the deliberations of the International Law Commission, and in this regard requests the Secretary-General to forward to the Commission, for its attention, the records of the debate on the report of the Commission, together with such written statements as delegations may circulate in conjunction with their oral statements, and to prepare and distribute a topical summary of the debate, following established practice;

Requests the Secretariat to circulate to States, as soon as possible after the conclusion of the session of the International Law Commission, chapter II of its report containing a summary of the work of that session, chapter III containing the specific issues on which the views of Governments would be of particular interest to the Commission and the draft articles adopted on either first or second reading by the Commission;

Also requests the Secretariat to make the complete report of the International Law Commission available as soon as possible after the conclusion of the session of the Commission for the consideration of Member States with due anticipation and no later than the prescribed time limit for reports in the General Assembly;

Encourages the International Law Commission to continue to consider ways in which specific issues on which the views of Governments would be of particular interest to the Commission could be framed so as to help Governments to have a better appreciation of the issues on which responses are required;

Recommends that the debate on the report of the International Law Commission at the seventy-sixth session of the General Assembly commence on 25 October 2021.

Who adopted this document and its mandates?

What other versions does this mandate have?

Which reports were submitted under this mandate?

What subjects does this mandate have?

What’s in this document?

Table of contents