Proposed Programme Budget Outline for the Biennium 2016-2017

A/RES/69/264View PDF

Who adopted this document and its mandates?

A Resolution of the General Assembly, under agenda item 131 Review of the efficiency of the administrative and financial functioning of the United Nations, published in 2015.

What other versions does this mandate have?

14 versions · 1991–2017

This is an older version — the most recent is A/RES/71/274

Year	Symbol	Title	Word length	Text similarity
2017	A/RES/71/274	Proposed programme budget outline for the biennium 2018-2019	512	68%Compare
2015	A/RES/69/264	Proposed programme budget outline for the biennium 2016-2017	632	48%Compare
2013	A/RES/67/248	Proposed programme budget outline for the biennium 2014-2015	916	40%Compare
2011	A/RES/65/262	Proposed programme budget outline for the biennium 2012-2013	803	43%Compare
2009	A/RES/63/266	Proposed programme budget outline for the biennium 2010-2011	1,000	42%Compare

Which reports were submitted under this mandate?

1 report · 2007

Year	Symbol	Title		Mandate resolution
2007	A/62/229	Review of the experience of the utilization of the contingency fund report of the Secretary-General		A/RES/61/254

What subjects does this mandate have?

3 subjects

Financial Resources Programme Budgeting Programme Priorities

What’s in this document?

25 operative paragraphs

Takes note of the report of the Secretary-General;Error: Reference source not found

Endorses the observations and recommendations contained in the report of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions;Error: Reference source not found

Reaffirms that the budget outline should provide a greater level of predictability of resources required for the following biennium and promote greater involvement of Member States in the budgetary process, thereby facilitating the broadest possible agreement on the programme budget;

Also reaffirms that the proposed programme budget outline shall contain an indication of the following:

A preliminary estimate of resources needed to accommodate the proposed programme of activities during the biennium;

Priorities, reflecting general trends of a broad sectoral nature;

Real growth, positive or negative, compared with the previous budget;

Size of the contingency fund expressed as a percentage of the overall level of resources;

Stresses that the budget outline is a preliminary estimate of resources;

Decides that the preliminary estimate of resources for the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2016–2017 should therefore include a provision for special political missions, in the amount of 1,130,400,000 United States dollars, which should be reflected in the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2016–2017, and that additional requirements shall continue to be treated in accordance with the provisions of General Assembly resolution 41/213;

Invites the Secretary-General to prepare his proposed programme budget for the biennium 2016–2017 on the basis of a preliminary estimate of 5,558,395,600 dollars at revised 2014–2015 rates;

Decides that the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2016–2017 shall contain provisions for recosting on the basis of the existing methodology;

Also decides that the priorities for the biennium 2016–2017 shall be the following:

Promotion of sustained economic growth and sustainable development in accordance with the relevant resolutions of the General Assembly and recent United Nations conferences;

Maintenance of international peace and security;

Development of Africa;

Promotion of human rights;

Effective coordination of humanitarian assistance efforts;

Promotion of justice and international law;

Disarmament;

Drug control, crime prevention and combating international terrorism in all its forms and manifestations;

Requests the Secretary-General to reflect the priorities outlined in paragraph 9 above when presenting the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2016–2017;

Reaffirms that the budget proposals of the Secretary-General should reflect resource levels commensurate with mandates for their full, efficient and effective implementation;

Reaffirms its request to the Secretary-General to propose, in future budget submissions, measures to offset budget increases, wherever possible, in particular through more efficient back-office activities, services, functions and structures, without undermining the implementation of mandated programme activities;

Decides that the contingency fund shall be set at the level of 0.75 per cent of the preliminary estimate, namely, at 41,687,967 dollars, that this amount shall be in addition to the overall level of the preliminary estimate and that it shall be used in accordance with the procedures for the use and operation of the contingency fund.

Who adopted this document and its mandates?

What other versions does this mandate have?

Which reports were submitted under this mandate?

What subjects does this mandate have?

What’s in this document?

Table of contents