The Negative Impact of the Non-Repatriation of Funds of Illicit Origin to the Countries of Origin on the Enjoyment of Human Rights, and the Importance of Improving International Cooperation

A/HRC/RES/58/7View PDF

Who adopted this document and its mandates?

A document of the Human Rights Council, under agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, published in 2025.

What other versions does this mandate have?

10 versions · 2012–2025

Year	Symbol	Title	Word length	Text similarity
2025	A/HRC/RES/58/7	The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of origin on the enjoyment of human rights, and the importance of improving international cooperation	4,010	85%Compare
2023	A/HRC/RES/52/21	The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of origin on the enjoyment of human rights, and the importance of improving international cooperation	3,618	77%Compare
2021	A/HRC/RES/46/11	The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of origin on the enjoyment of human rights, and the importance of improving international cooperation	3,452	81%Compare
2019	A/HRC/RES/40/4	The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of origin on the enjoyment of human rights, and the importance of improving international cooperation	3,236	49%Compare
2017	A/HRC/RES/34/11	The negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of origin on the enjoyment of human rights, and the importance of improving international cooperation	3,874	75%Compare

Who cites this mandate in the budget?

1 entity

Entity	(Sub-)Programme	Title	Total mandates cited	Expenditure
	Subprogramme 1	Human rights mainstreaming, right to development, and research and analysis	108

Historical expenditure covers the complete programme or subprogramme, not this mandate. For an overview of all UN entities and programmes, see UN entities and programmes.

Who cites this mandate in the budget?

1 entity

Entity	(Sub-)Programme	Title	Total mandates cited	Expenditure
	Subprogramme 1	Human rights mainstreaming, right to development, and research and analysis	108	—

Historical expenditure covers the complete programme or subprogramme, not this mandate. For an overview of all UN entities and programmes, see UN entities and programmes.

What subjects does this mandate have?

9 subjects

Corruption Crime Prevention Criminal Assets Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Human Rights Illicit Funds Transfer International Cooperation Law Enforcement Repatriation

What’s in this document?

31 operative paragraphs

Recalls the study of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on utilizing non-repatriated illicit funds with a view to supporting the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals,² and also recalls the proposed courses of action in the study;

²A/HRC/43/66.

Welcomes the work undertaken by the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights,³ and requests her to continue to consider the impact of illicit financial flows on the enjoyment of human rights as part of the mandate;

³See A/HRC/58/51.

Also welcomes the holding on 13 February 2024 of the intersessional expert meeting on the obstacles to the repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of origin and their impact on the enjoyment of human rights;⁴

⁴See A/HRC/56/37.

Recalls with appreciation the report of the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights on a non-binding set of practical guidelines for efficient asset recovery;⁵

⁵A/HRC/52/45.

Recalls the high-level meeting on international cooperation to combat illicit financial flows and strengthen good practices on assets return, convened by the President of the General Assembly on 16 May 2019;

Calls upon all States that have not yet acceded to the United Nations Convention against Corruption to consider doing so as a matter of priority;

Underscores that the repatriation return of funds of illicit origin is key for States that are undergoing a reform process and for improving the realization of economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, and for fulfilling their obligation to meet the legitimate aspirations of their peoples;

Urges requesting and requested States to cooperate in recovering the proceeds of corruption, in particular embezzled public funds, stolen assets and unaccounted-for assets, including those that are found in safe havens, and to demonstrate strong commitment to ensuring the return or disposal of such assets, including their return to the countries of origin;

Urges requested States to ensure the prompt and unconditional repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of origin, to actively participate in adopting a renewed, decisive and proactive commitment to tackle the phenomenon of illicit financial flows and their ensuing negative impact on human rights and the right to development, and to take urgent action to push forward the procedures aimed at the recovery of stolen assets;

Encourages requested States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption to respond to requests for assistance and to adopt such measures as may be necessary to enable them to provide a wider scope of assistance, pursuant to article 46 of the said Convention, in the absence of dual criminality;

Asserts the urgent need to return the proceeds of crime to requesting countries without conditionalities, in accordance with the United Nations Convention against Corruption and with due process, to strive to eliminate safe havens that create incentives for transfer abroad of stolen assets and illicit financial flows, and to strengthen regulatory frameworks at all levels;

Calls upon all States to consider enacting legislation to address offences by business enterprises, including multinational corporations, that deprive Governments of legitimate domestic sources of revenue for the implementation of their development agendas, in compliance with their international obligations, including international human rights law;

Underlines that there is also a corporate responsibility to comply with and respect all applicable laws and human rights, and a need for greater access to effective remedies by victims in order to realize effective prevention of, and remedy for, business-related human rights harm, as set out in the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights;

Calls upon all States to seek to reduce opportunities for tax avoidance, to consider inserting anti-abuse clauses in all tax treaties and to enhance disclosure practices and transparency in both source and destination countries, including by seeking to ensure transparency in all financial transactions between Governments and companies to relevant tax authorities;

Also calls upon all States to consider waiving or reducing to the barest minimum reasonable expenses deducted when recovering assets, particularly when the requesting State is a developing country, bearing in mind that the return of illicitly acquired assets contributes to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals;

Reiterates the importance of full compliance with international human rights law in relation to the return of proceeds of crime, in particular due process rights in criminal or civil law matters against persons presumed to be responsible for corruption, tax evasion or other related criminal conduct and with respect to freezing and forfeiture;

Invites the Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption to consider ways to implement the Convention that take human rights into full consideration, including when dealing with the return of the proceeds of crime, and appreciates the continued efforts of the Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group on Asset Recovery of the Conference to assist States parties in fulfilling their obligations under the Convention to prevent, detect and deter in a more effective manner the international transfer of the proceeds of crime and to strengthen international cooperation in asset recovery;

Calls upon States to continue to consider the establishment of an intergovernmental working group on the negative impact of illicit financial flows on the enjoyment of human rights, and to explore further policy responses to the phenomenon;

Acknowledges the important role that civil society can play in exposing corruption and drawing attention to the negative impact of the non-repatriation of funds of illicit origin on the rule of law and the realization of economic, social and cultural rights, and reiterates in this context the obligation of States to protect reporting persons in accordance with article 33 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption and the Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

Welcomes national initiatives to adopt anti-money-laundering legislation as an important step in the fight against corruption and the willingness demonstrated by some States to cooperate in facilitating the return of the proceeds of crime, and calls for more robust regulations in this regard, including through the implementation of policies aimed at reducing the flow of the proceeds of crime and ensuring their return and the provision of technical assistance to developing countries;

Encourages all States to share best practices in the freezing and recovery of funds of illicit origin;

Calls for further international cooperation through, inter alia, the United Nations system, in support of national, subregional and regional efforts to prevent and combat corrupt practices and the transfer of assets of illicit origin, in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, and in this regard encourages close cooperation at the national and international levels among anti-corruption agencies, law enforcement agencies and financial intelligence units;

Calls upon all States requested to repatriate funds of illicit origin to uphold fully their commitment to make the fight against corruption a priority at all levels and to curb the illicit transfer of funds, in accordance with the United Nations Convention against Corruption, and to make every effort to achieve the repatriation of funds of illicit origin to requesting States in order to diminish the negative impact of non-repatriation, including on the enjoyment of human rights, in particular economic, social and cultural rights in the countries of origin by, inter alia, lowering the barriers imposed on requiring jurisdictions at the tracing stage and enhancing cooperation in this regard between competent agencies, taking into particular account the risks of dissipation of those funds and, where appropriate, by delinking confiscation measures from a requirement of conviction in the country of origin;

Calls upon all States requesting the repatriation of funds of illicit origin to uphold fully their commitment to make the fight against corruption a priority at all levels and to curb the illicit transfer of funds, and to apply the principles of accountability, transparency and participation in the decision-making process regarding the allocation of repatriated funds to the realization of economic, social and cultural rights in order to improve prevention and detection procedures, correct identified weaknesses or mismanagement, prevent impunity, provide effective remedies directed at creating conditions for avoiding new human rights violations and improve the overall administration of justice;

Reaffirms that it is the obligation of the State to investigate and then prosecute corruption on the basis of evidence, and calls upon all States to strengthen criminal and/or civil proceedings directed at freezing or restraining funds of illicit origin, and in this context encourages requested States to provide information on legal frameworks and procedures to requesting States and to remove barriers to asset recovery, including by simplifying their legal procedures and responding to requests for mutual legal assistance;

Requests the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to organize, prior to the sixty-second session of the Human Rights Council, a one-day intersessional expert meeting, fully accessible to persons with disabilities, on strengthening international cooperation and shared responsibilities in facilitating the repatriation of illicit funds to advance human rights, in particular economic, social and cultural rights and the right to development, to discuss strategies, policies and best practices in this regard and to make recommendations, with the participation of States, the Advisory Committee and other relevant stakeholders;

Requests the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to organize, before the sixty-third session of the Human Rights Council, a regional expert meeting in Africa on ways to support Governments’ efforts in repatriating funds of illicit origin to advance the realization of economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, with a view to discuss strategies, policies and best practices and make recommendations, with the participation of African States, the African Union and its relevant institutions, national human rights institutions, national anti-corruption institutions, civil society representatives and other relevant stakeholders, such as the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and the World Bank;

Also requests the Office of the High Commissioner to prepare a substantive report on enhancing international cooperation and national efforts to facilitate the repatriation of illicit funds and ensure the effective use of repatriated funds for sustainable development and the realization of economic, social and cultural rights, to be informed by the expert meetings and the input from experts from diverse geographic regions, including from States, relevant intergovernmental organizations, United Nations agencies, funds and programmes, relevant special procedures of the Human Rights Council, the Advisory Committee, the treaty bodies, national human rights institutions and civil society representatives, including relevant local government networks and non-governmental organizations, and to present the report to the Council at its sixty-fourth session;

Stresses the need for transparency in financial institutions and effective due diligence measures to be applied by financial intermediaries, calls upon States to seek appropriate means in accordance with their international obligations to ensure the cooperation and responsiveness of financial institutions to foreign requests to freeze and recover funds of illicit origin and the provision of an efficient mutual legal assistance regime to States requesting repatriation of those funds, and encourages the promotion of human and institutional capacity-building in that regard;

Requests the Secretary-General to bring the present resolution to the attention of all States Members of the United Nations and forums dealing with the issue of the repatriation of funds of illicit origin within the United Nations system for consideration and necessary action and coordination as appropriate, particularly within the context of the Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development;

Decides to continue its consideration of this matter under the same agenda item.

Who adopted this document and its mandates?

What other versions does this mandate have?

Who cites this mandate in the budget?

Who cites this mandate in the budget?

What subjects does this mandate have?

What’s in this document?

Table of contents

Who cites this mandate in the budget?